| News for Reservists |  |
| Top Story
|  |  |
|
- Legislation would require study of reservist transition periods
The Senate passed a defense bill amendment Thursday requiring the secretary of defense to conduct a study on how much support reservists and National Guardsmen receive while reintegrating into civilian life after deployments. Among other objectives, the study would evaluate the feasibility of allowing service members to stay on active duty for a limited time after deployments. The Hill/Floor Action blog
(11/29)
-
Senate measure urges faster U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan:
The Senate voted 62-33 on Thursday for a measure that presses for a quicker withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, but it doesn't offer specifics on how that could be accomplished. Thirteen Republicans supported the measure, which was introduced as an amendment to the 2013 defense authorization bill. CBS News/The Associated Press
(11/29)

| In the Pentagon
|  |  |
|
- Opinion: Japan's nuclear plant is a dangerous step toward proliferation
Japan has quietly made plans to start up a nuclear reprocessing plant next year capable of extracting as much as 8 tons of weapons-usable plutonium per year, write Frank N. von Hippel, a professor at Princeton, and Masafumi Takubo, a nuclear policy analyst. "[R]eprocessing not only creates a tempting target for terrorists, it also sets a precedent for countries around the world to follow suit -- and pushes the world toward rampant nuclear proliferation," they write. The New York Times (tiered subscription model)
(11/28)
| On the Hill
|  |  |
|
- Sequestration is unavoidable, lawmaker says
A deal to completely stop sequestration cuts before they take full effect could occur this spring but is unlikely to come any sooner, said Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., chairman of the readiness panel of the House Armed Services Committee. "I am fully expecting to see sequestration in some form beginning in January," he said. AOL Defense
(11/28)
| On the Home Front
|  |  |
|
| Reserve Life
|  |  |
|
- Judge: VA not required to prioritize vets when awarding contracts
The Department of Veterans Affairs doesn't always need to consider bids from veteran-owned businesses before awarding contracts, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, rejecting a claim by the Government Accountability Office. The judge said that the Veterans First law, which requires the VA to give priority to veterans when awarding contracts, does not apply to pre-existing contracts involving bulk orders. "If this [decision] is followed by other courts, it is kind of devastating to veterans," said Tim Power, an attorney for the plaintiff in the case. Bloomberg Businessweek
(11/29)
| SmartQuote
|  |  |
|
 | The robbed that smiles, steals something from the thief."
--William Shakespeare, British playwright

|
| |
|
Advertise
|
| Associate Publisher:
Jim Eubanks
(202) 407-7822 |
| |
|
Read more at
SmartBrief.com |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| | Recent
ROA SmartBrief Issues:
- Thursday, November 29, 2012
- Wednesday, November 28, 2012
- Tuesday, November 27, 2012
- Monday, November 26, 2012
- Wednesday, November 21, 2012
| | | Lead Editor:
Sam Taute
Mailing Address:
SmartBrief, Inc.®, 555 11th ST NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20004 | |
| |
|
| © 1999-2012 SmartBrief, Inc.®
Legal Information |
|